Clinical utility of MRI in acute stroke beyond reperfusion therapy.

Background: Stroke is primarily a clinical diagnosis. It can be hemorrhagic or ischemic in etiology. Computed tomography (CT) brain is usually the initial investigation in most patients with suspected stroke. Although it has excellent accuracy in diagnosing hemorrhage, ischemic changes may not be apparent in the first few hours. Some centers use focused magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies to help in selecting appropriate patients for reperfusion therapy. However, clinicians often use this investigation even when reperfusion therapy is not being considered. This study aims to find out whether doing an MRI in addition to a CT scan has any clinical utility in this situation. Primary Objective: To determine the proportion of patients who undergo a change in their management based on MRI findings. Secondary Objectives: 1. To determine the time duration from the onset of symptoms to presentation at the hospital. 2. To determine the time duration from presentation to the hospital to get CT performed. 3. To determine the proportion of patients who had MRI in addition to CT. 4. To determine the time duration from CT performed to MRI performed. Materials and Methods Study Design: Retrospective, descriptive observational study. Inclusion Criteria: Patients above age 18 admitted at a tertiary hospital with a clinical diagnosis of stroke between 1/8/2018 and 30/7/2019. Exclusion Criteria: Patients who had already undergone MRI before presentation to the hospital and patients undergoing thrombolysis. Patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were identified from the hospital information system and the ward admission register and by manual examination of the patients' case notes. Relevant data were obtained from the case notes and collected on a google form and downloaded in Microsoft Excel 2019. SPSS version 22 was used for data analysis. Results: Out of the 106 patients, 54% (n = 57) were diagnosed as having ischemic stroke, whereas 46% (n = 49) were diagnosed with hemorrhagic stroke after initial assessment and CT scan. Only 2.8% (n = 3) of the patients presented within 4.5 hours of the onset of symptoms. 43.4% (n = 46) presented between 4.5 and 24 hours from the onset, whereas 53.8% (n = 57) presented more than 24 hours after the onset. Twenty-seven patients had their CT scan performed prior to their presentation at the center. For the remaining 79, the median time from presentation to CT scanning was 2 ± 1.5 hours. 24.5% (n = 26) of all patients had an MRI performed in addition to the CT scan. There was wide variation in the time from CT scanning to the MRI. Among the patients who had an MRI, additional information was obtained by the investigation in 58% (n = 15). However, this led to a change in management in only three (11.5%) of the patients. On review, it was found that the change was justified in only two patients. Furthermore, one patient who was diagnosed with tuberculoma had a long history of fever which was missed on initial evaluation. Considering these, MRI can be credited for a meaningful change in management in only 4% (n = 1) of the cases. Conclusion: The findings of this study do not support the routine use of MRI in patients who are not candidates for reperfusion therapy. Their use should be restricted to cases where some specific information is sought or where there is diagnostic uncertainty. Allocation of resources in developing integrated acute stroke pathways is likely to give a better value for money.

Impact of Door-to-Balloon Time Reduction Depending on the Killip Classification in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Transported by Emergency Medical Services.

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic occurred in several countries, making the conventional medical system difficult to maintain. Recent recommendations aim to prevent nosocomial infections and infections among health care workers. Therefore, establishing a cardiovascular medical system under an emergency for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is desired. This study aimed to determine the relationship between prognosis and door-to-balloon time (DBT) shortening based on the severity on arrival.This retrospective, multi-center, observational study included 1,127 consecutive patients with STEMI. These patients were transported by emergency medical services and underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients were stratified according to the Killip classification: Killip 1 (n = 738) and Killip ≥ 2 (n = 389) groups.Patients in the Killip ≥ 2 group were older, with more females, and more severity on arrival than those in the Killip 1 group. The 30-day mortality rate in the Killip 1 and Killip ≥ 2 groups was 2.2% and 18.0%, respectively. The Killip ≥ 2 group had a significant difference in the 30-day mortality between patients with DBT ≤ 90 minutes and those with DBT > 90 minutes; however, this did not occur in the Killip 1 group. Furthermore, multivariate analysis revealed that DBT ≤ 90 minutes was not a significant predictive factor in the Killip 1 group; however, it was an independent predictive factor in the Killip ≥ 2 group.DBT shortening affected the 30-day mortality in STEMI patients with Killip ≥ 2, although not those with Killip 1.

The impact of home quarantine during COVID-19 lockdown on neurological hospitalizations, in-hospital mortality, and acute ischemic stroke management in older patients without COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate the impact of home quarantine in older patients without COVID-19 hospitalized due to neurological disorders. METHODS: We consecutively enrolled 255 elderly patients(median age: 75 years, female: 54%), including 180 (70%) in the pre-home quarantine period and 75 (30%) home quarantine period from January to May 2020 (ten weeks before and ten weeks after the March 21, 2020, lockdown for older patients in Turkey) in a tertiary referral neurological center. RESULTS: In the home quarantine period, we documented a fall in the number of neurological admissions by 58.3%, but an increased need for intensive care in older patients. Patients in the home quarantine period were younger [73 (65-91) vs 76 (65-95), p = 0.005], had worse Glasgow Coma Scores (12.3 ± 3.6 vs 13.7 ± 2.5, p = 0.007), higher in-hospital mortality rate (21.3% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.001), had a lower prevalence of comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease, and chronic neurologic disease, albeit had a higher prevalence of the acute cerebrovascular disease (hemorrhagic/ ischemic stroke)(90.7% vs 78.9, p = 0.025). In this period, even there was an increase in the proportion of the patients undergoing reperfusion therapy, it wasn't statistically significant (20.3% vs. 10.1%, p: 0.054). Multivariate analysis revealed that high NIHSS (The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) score (OR=1.25; p < 0.001) and hospitalization in the home quarantine period (OR=3.21; p = 0.043) were independently associated with in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: Our study indicated that during the COVID-19 home quarantine period, despite a significantly fewer number of patients admitted to the hospitalization, there was a higher percentage of those hospitalized needing intensive care and an overall worse prognosis.

Evaluation of Workflow Delays in Stroke Reperfusion Therapy: A Comparison between the Year-Long Pre-COVID-19 Period and the with-COVID-19 Period.

AIM: We evaluated the delay in stroke reperfusion therapy between the pre-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) period and the with-COVID-19 period, and compared this delay between each phase of the with-COVID-19 period. METHODS: Patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) undergoing intravenous thrombolysis and/or mechanical thrombectomy were selected from our single-center prospective registry. The time to perform reperfusion therapy were compared between patients admitted from March 2019 to February 2020 (pre-COVID-19 group) and those from March 2020 to February 2021 (with-COVID-19 group). Patients in the with-COVID-19 group were further divided into three 4-month-long subgroups (first-phase: March to June 2020; second-phase: July to October 2020; third-phase: November 2020 to February 2021), and the time delay of reperfusion therapy were compared between these subgroups. RESULTS: Of 1,260 patients with AIS hospitalized in the study period, 265 patients were examined. Compared with the pre-COVID-19 group (133 patients; median age, 79 years), the with-COVID-19 group (132 patients; median age, 79 years) had a longer median door-to-imaging time (25 min vs. 27 min, P=0.04), and a longer door-to-groin puncture time (65 min vs. 72 min, P=0.02). In the three 4-month-long subgroups, the median door-to-needle time (49 min, 43 min, and 38 min, respectively; P=0.04) and door-to-groin puncture time (83 min, 70 min, and 61 min, P＜0.01, respectively) decreased significantly during the with-COVID-19 period. CONCLUSIONS: The delay in reperfusion therapy increased during the with-COVID-19 period compared with the pre-COVID-19 period. However, the door-to-needle time and door-to-groin puncture time decreased as time elapsed during the with-COVID-19 period. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT02251665.